Well here's one I have not seen before.
New client - he's a (now) semi-retired builder. Sold about 20 properties in the past five years on private contracts. He receives 1099-Int's from the bank or brokerage house handling the contracts on behalf of the seller and buyer.
His past 3 years returns the EA preparing the returns has treated said income as schedule C income, instead of interest income. Considering he has had losses the past three years in his business it makes no difference on the return whether he claimed the income on line 8 or line 12, I just want to know what is right?
From my perspective, he is a builder, not a bank. Although he is acting in the capacity of the bank, he is not in business to loan money, but he loaned money to support his builder business.
It seems incorrect to me to put him in a position to pay social security taxes on interest income, which will happen in about 2 years when his depreciation of his existing equipment runs out.
He is still building one or two houses a year, but not enough business to justify new equipment and has no plans to replace anything.
Well, experts, whats right? I can't find a definitive answer... and I've looked in my tax book which I like very much by the way....
retailguy (who is hopelessly swamped with 19 days to go....)
New client - he's a (now) semi-retired builder. Sold about 20 properties in the past five years on private contracts. He receives 1099-Int's from the bank or brokerage house handling the contracts on behalf of the seller and buyer.
His past 3 years returns the EA preparing the returns has treated said income as schedule C income, instead of interest income. Considering he has had losses the past three years in his business it makes no difference on the return whether he claimed the income on line 8 or line 12, I just want to know what is right?
From my perspective, he is a builder, not a bank. Although he is acting in the capacity of the bank, he is not in business to loan money, but he loaned money to support his builder business.
It seems incorrect to me to put him in a position to pay social security taxes on interest income, which will happen in about 2 years when his depreciation of his existing equipment runs out.
He is still building one or two houses a year, but not enough business to justify new equipment and has no plans to replace anything.
Well, experts, whats right? I can't find a definitive answer... and I've looked in my tax book which I like very much by the way....
retailguy (who is hopelessly swamped with 19 days to go....)
Comment