I've run across a client situation that disturbs me, and I'd like to ask if anyone here may have some insight. A client had a financial advisor who convinced the client to move money from a qualified plan into a Self-Directed IRA. The trustee for the Self-Directed IRA then executed a promissory note with the financial advisor and loaned the the money to the financial advisor. I'm fairly sure the promissory note is in default.
The client is (FINALLY) onto the financial advisor's shenanigans and has a lawyer involved. For a host of unrelated reasons, there's no question in anyone's mind that the financial advisor is a low-life. Legal action of some sort is under way, although recovery prospects are looking slim.
But my question involves the trustee for the Self-Directed IRA. Would they not have some duty to refuse to handle a transaction of this type, or am I just too close to the situation and am expecting the trustee to have exercised 20/20 hindsight?
The client is (FINALLY) onto the financial advisor's shenanigans and has a lawyer involved. For a host of unrelated reasons, there's no question in anyone's mind that the financial advisor is a low-life. Legal action of some sort is under way, although recovery prospects are looking slim.
But my question involves the trustee for the Self-Directed IRA. Would they not have some duty to refuse to handle a transaction of this type, or am I just too close to the situation and am expecting the trustee to have exercised 20/20 hindsight?
Comment