I am posting this as a poll. Comments are also welcome...
Has anyone ever made an audio recording of the interview in an office audit?
By "office audit," I am referring to an audit that takes place in the IRS office (as opposed to a correspondence audit or a field audit). In this particular case, the auditor has advised me that she expects to complete the entire task after one meeting with me, and that the client does not need to be present. The examination notice identifies only two items for review: Home Office and Cost of Goods Sold (Schedule C, Form 1040).
To me, it's pretty transparent:
The benefit of an audio record is that you get a perfect, incontestable record of what was said. It may help prevent the auditor from trying to stray into areas that are not properly within the scope of the exam, and it may help defend against any later claim that the representative or the taxpayer was uncooperative. It may help show that the auditor was hostile, or may proactively prevent the auditor from taking an overly hostile or adversarial approach.
The downside is that making the audio recording may, paradoxically, transform the meeting into something more hostile or adversarial than it should be. In other words, it may put the auditor on edge, or create some tension that would not otherwise exist.
Has anyone ever done this? If so, what was your experience?
BMK
Has anyone ever made an audio recording of the interview in an office audit?
By "office audit," I am referring to an audit that takes place in the IRS office (as opposed to a correspondence audit or a field audit). In this particular case, the auditor has advised me that she expects to complete the entire task after one meeting with me, and that the client does not need to be present. The examination notice identifies only two items for review: Home Office and Cost of Goods Sold (Schedule C, Form 1040).
To me, it's pretty transparent:
The benefit of an audio record is that you get a perfect, incontestable record of what was said. It may help prevent the auditor from trying to stray into areas that are not properly within the scope of the exam, and it may help defend against any later claim that the representative or the taxpayer was uncooperative. It may help show that the auditor was hostile, or may proactively prevent the auditor from taking an overly hostile or adversarial approach.
The downside is that making the audio recording may, paradoxically, transform the meeting into something more hostile or adversarial than it should be. In other words, it may put the auditor on edge, or create some tension that would not otherwise exist.
Has anyone ever done this? If so, what was your experience?
BMK
Comment