I have a client that is being given a choice for 2012 to pay more in premiums than he is paying now or take a high deductible health plan, pay much less, and open a HSA which the company will fund the first year only.
But the clients costs to fund a HSA in future years will also be similar because he has been funding a Sec 125 to pay out-of-pocket medical expenses now.
I plan to just give the tax comparisons and refer the client to an insurance agent for overall insurance potection either way. But I would like to understand what is happening here:
In looking it over it seems that he will definitely save money but the future medical costs will be hinged upon only whether he stays healthy or not. Is that the conclusion you have reached in this type of change?
But the clients costs to fund a HSA in future years will also be similar because he has been funding a Sec 125 to pay out-of-pocket medical expenses now.
I plan to just give the tax comparisons and refer the client to an insurance agent for overall insurance potection either way. But I would like to understand what is happening here:
In looking it over it seems that he will definitely save money but the future medical costs will be hinged upon only whether he stays healthy or not. Is that the conclusion you have reached in this type of change?
Comment