Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Home sweet Home(s)
Collapse
X
-
It's early for me, and being the Wall Street Journal, I broke my own rule against following blind links. But I figure I may as well provide some details for the benefit of others:
The Journal reports on the Driscoll case, where the Tax Court concluded that the clergy housing allowance didn't place a dollar limit on the exclusion nor a limit on the number of homes to which it could apply. The result for Mr. Driscoll was a savings of over $400K in taxes. The IRS is appealing, while the Senate Finance Committee has been investigating the general issue.
The Journal triggered one of my pet peeves, which is to quote a multi-year number without annualizing it, or even mentioning the number of years. In this case, the $400K tax bill (excluding penalties) was for four years of returns.
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment