I wonder if any of us have the demographics on a possible correlation between job creation in states that have no income tax versus the other states?
Heard recently that 38% of all jobs created in 2011 are in Texas. Nevada (another state with no income tax) would not have created many but considering its low population may still have a healthy percentage increase.
Job losses over last several years have hit the rust bowl heavily. Some of the northeast states have traditionally very high state income taxes plus nasty state revenue people to deal with.
There are, of course, other factors that tax-and-spend proponents can claim. The great military BRAC program launched under Pres Bush is now in full swing and targeted his home state of Texas as the biggest recipient of military transfer. Certainly the rust-bowl states can cite obvious economic factors (other than taxation) as the reason for their loss of jobs.
The no-tax states are Texas, Washington, Nevada, Wyoming, South Dakota, Florida, Tennessee and New Hampshire. Maybe Alaska - I don't know much of what happens up there. I wonder if there is a website (maybe under Dept of Labor) that outlines job growth in these states versus the other 41 states.
And yes, there are other factors involved in jobs, but it would sure be more than coincidence if these few states all had this common thread in their performance.
Heard recently that 38% of all jobs created in 2011 are in Texas. Nevada (another state with no income tax) would not have created many but considering its low population may still have a healthy percentage increase.
Job losses over last several years have hit the rust bowl heavily. Some of the northeast states have traditionally very high state income taxes plus nasty state revenue people to deal with.
There are, of course, other factors that tax-and-spend proponents can claim. The great military BRAC program launched under Pres Bush is now in full swing and targeted his home state of Texas as the biggest recipient of military transfer. Certainly the rust-bowl states can cite obvious economic factors (other than taxation) as the reason for their loss of jobs.
The no-tax states are Texas, Washington, Nevada, Wyoming, South Dakota, Florida, Tennessee and New Hampshire. Maybe Alaska - I don't know much of what happens up there. I wonder if there is a website (maybe under Dept of Labor) that outlines job growth in these states versus the other 41 states.
And yes, there are other factors involved in jobs, but it would sure be more than coincidence if these few states all had this common thread in their performance.
Comment