Single Member LLC

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rae
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2006
    • 27

    #1

    Single Member LLC

    Is it 'legitimate' for a Single Member LLC to pay rent to the member. The business is using an outbuilding 100% for the business. The outbuilding is owned by and is on the property of the sole member. Can the LLC pay the 'person' rent?

    Thanks!
    RJ
  • BHoffman
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 1768

    #2
    Originally posted by Rae
    Is it 'legitimate' for a Single Member LLC to pay rent to the member. The business is using an outbuilding 100% for the business. The outbuilding is owned by and is on the property of the sole member. Can the LLC pay the 'person' rent?

    Thanks!
    RJ
    Hi RJ - If the SMLLC is taxed on Sch C I think it would be better to just use the home office form 8829.

    Otherwise the rent expense is going to wash against the rental income and there will be no deduction at all.

    Self rentals losses are disallowed and carry forward.

    Comment

    • Rae
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2006
      • 27

      #3
      But by paying a fair rent there will be less self-employment tax and the Sch E would most likely show a profit.

      Comment

      • BHoffman
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 1768

        #4
        Originally posted by Rae
        But by paying a fair rent there will be less self-employment tax and the Sch E would most likely show a profit.
        You have a point. But the home office deduction also decreases the SE tax. I guess it depends on whether the fair rent will exceed the home office deduction.

        Comment

        • veritas
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2005
          • 3290

          #5
          a taxpayer

          paying payments to himself is not rent.

          This is assuming the LLC is not a corporation.

          Comment

          • Gretel
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2005
            • 4008

            #6
            Agree with Veritas. A two member LLC would be different either for the business or the rental property.

            Comment

            • BHoffman
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2008
              • 1768

              #7
              In Vino Veritas, and he is right.

              Comment

              • jimmcg
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2005
                • 633

                #8
                Originally posted by veritas
                paying payments to himself is not rent.

                This is assuming the LLC is not a corporation.
                Therefore the LLC needs to be structured differently (perhaps minority interest) to accomplish the desired result.

                Comment

                • Rae
                  Junior Member
                  • Feb 2006
                  • 27

                  #9
                  See, THIS is why I asked the question.... Single Member LLC (didn't say anything about being a Corp - it isn't). Is it legitimate for the LLC to pay rent to the owner... I thought I read somewhere it isn't. Can't ever find the source when you need it!! I know, in the long run, it would be much more advantageous for the owner if he could collect fair rent from the LLC.

                  Comment

                  • DaveinTexas
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 731

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Rae
                    See, THIS is why I asked the question.... Single Member LLC (didn't say anything about being a Corp - it isn't). Is it legitimate for the LLC to pay rent to the owner... I thought I read somewhere it isn't. Can't ever find the source when you need it!! I know, in the long run, it would be much more advantageous for the owner if he could collect fair rent from the LLC.

                    It would be handy if the taxpayer was married. The SMLLC could pay his wife rents; this may solve the separate owner problem; this arrangement is more difficult to pull off in a community property state though.

                    Here's a quote from the IRC and the latest edition of the EA Journal,

                    "Next, examine Sec. 162(a)(3) which allows
                    deductions for “rentals ... for purposes of the
                    trade or business, of property to which the
                    taxpayer has not taken ... title or in which
                    he has no equity.” In other words, a business
                    (whether a sole proprietorship or a single
                    member LLC disregarded entity) cannot deduct
                    rent to itself or to its owner, who is one and
                    the same as a Schedule C business."

                    You'll need to sign up as a member of NAEA to get the rest of the article, or pay me a small fee; Only joking!

                    If it makes good business sense the TP can elect S Status for the SMLLC (as mentioned by the other posters) to create separation of ownership interests (separate legal and tax entity).

                    Hope that helps.
                    Circular 230 Disclosure:

                    Don't even think about using the information in this message!

                    Comment

                    • Rae
                      Junior Member
                      • Feb 2006
                      • 27

                      #11
                      THAT'S what I thought. Thank you, thank you, thank you for the quote!

                      Here's payment - $$$$$$

                      PS - He's not married YET!!

                      Comment

                      • DaveinTexas
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2006
                        • 731

                        #12
                        You're welcome, welcome and welcome

                        Originally posted by Rae
                        THAT'S what I thought. Thank you, thank you, thank you for the quote!

                        Here's payment - $$$$$$

                        PS - He's not married YET!!
                        I wonder if I have to pay taxes on funny money?

                        Have a great tax season and try to stay sane!
                        Circular 230 Disclosure:

                        Don't even think about using the information in this message!

                        Comment

                        Working...