a friend died in january 2010 age 69, (she would have been 70 in february 2011) her husband 77 inherited her IRA account in Fidelity. he transfered the account to his name and wanted to continue receiving monthly distribution. i told him because of the RMD he had to take out more than what she was taking and fidelity would compute how much he should take out based on his life expectancy.. well... fidelity told him he did not have to take any distributions from this account until next year. Does that sound right?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Inherited IRA and RMD
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Davc View PostIf the friend didn't take her RMD prior to death, then her husband needs to take it as soon as possible.
It wasn't clear in the OP if the husband merged his wife's IRA with his own, or if he opened an "Inherited IRA" and transferred her funds into that new account.
If the former, all it does is increase the balance in his account, thereby increasing the amount of his annual RMD. If the latter, he can wait until she would have been 70½ and then start taking RMDs from that new account. In this particular case it's the same, because she would have turned 70½ in 2010, but in another case there could be a delay of several (or many) years.Roland Slugg
"I do what I can."
Comment
-
Originally posted by taxmom34 View PostWould the IRA then use her life expectancy and not his?
I would highly recommend reading the relevant portions of IRS Pub 590. That Pub was recently rewritten and is now much better and clearer than it used to be.Roland Slugg
"I do what I can."
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment