I was reading my taxbook and I am unclear what to do with a cell phone if it is needed for business , but not reimbursed by employer . I'm puzzled where to claim it or a portion of it.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Cell Phones
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by photoman View PostI was reading my taxbook and I am unclear what to do with a cell phone if it is needed for business , but not reimbursed by employer . I'm puzzled where to claim it or a portion of it.
-
Cell Phone business use
My guess if its an employee (W-2) who needed the cell phone as required by the TP's employer yet not reimbursed by employer, that would fall under form 2106 under Sch A subject to AGI and that is if TP itemizes and only the % of the cell phone used for business for most likely the TP also uses the cell phone for personal as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AZ-Tax View PostMy guess if its an employee (W-2) who needed the cell phone as required by the TP's employer yet not reimbursed by employer, that would fall under form 2106 under Sch A subject to AGI
Comment
-
Originally posted by Burke View PostReimbursement of actual bus expenses under an accountable plan would not go on the W-2. Neither would the employee deduct anything.
Comment
-
It might sound stupid that a sole owner S-Corp has to hold at least annual meetings. A Corporation is a Corporation in the legal eye and it does not matter if 1 person or 100,000. It also does not matter which letter they are assigned A, B, C, S (just kidding).
Having said that, the legal paperwork throughout the year: annual meetings, record all major decisions in the minutes is what will eventually give liability protection. If something happens, the first thing a lawyer is after is the minute book. If it wasn't kept up to date, every shareholder is personally fully responsible for any damage.
So it defeats the purpose of being a S-Corp, if someone doesn't want the burden of the required paperwork. Then it is better to be a different entity then paying all the additionally costs of being a corp. and then not being protected after all.
Comment
-
Yes, that is true and for the longest time I was a big defender of LLC's, also because of non-requirements of meeting etc.
Recently had a meeting with a real good lawyer and revised my position somewhat. Nobody really knows how vulnerable a LLC is in case of liability law suit. For that reason I tend more towards S-Corp again or at least have LLC have meetings and record major decisions in minutes somewhere. I am curious how LLC's will do in future law suits.
Does anyone on this board has knowledge of any past LLC law suit for liability issues?
Comment
-
Originally posted by AccTaxMan View PostDoes another really expect all those single owner S-corps would hold a board meeting every year...the single owner talking to himself during the meetings?
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment