The President

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jimenright
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2006
    • 170

    #1

    The President

    said tonight in his State of the Union Message that the tax code should be simplified. It seems to me that all past attempts to simplify the tax code have resulted in a more complicated code. Can this be avoided; or is there a natural law to the contrary?
  • Uncle Sam
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2006
    • 1461

    #2
    The President

    Sounds nice - rhetoric of a good political speech.

    However - did he provide any technical specific facts or details?
    I'll bet you he can't explain anything descriptive about what's going to be changed or how.
    Just so long as he keeps repeating the $ 250,000 AGI threshholds.
    Uncle Sam, CPA, EA. ARA, NTPI Fellow

    Comment

    • Jiggers
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2005
      • 1973

      #3
      Simplification

      One way to simplify the tax code considerably would be the elimination of the EIC and Child Tax Credit welfare payments as part of filing.

      Make that a separate department and issue the checks monthly versus all at once. Makes the money go further for necessities versus the junk that it is blown on when the big $XXXX refund is received.

      It would make our work easier. But then some of us would be out of work if they relied on that type of business. I don't.
      Jiggers, EA

      Comment

      • taxxcpa
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2007
        • 978

        #4
        Tax silmplification

        If I had my way, the tax return would be almost simple enough to fit on a post card.

        List and add Salary, interest, dividends, gross rent and business income.
        List and deduct all expenses incurred in earning those incomes
        Deduct Standard deduction, medical expenses, and casualty losses
        Deduct exemption allowance
        Pay 10% tax on the net remaining amount. (maybe an additional 5% for fat cats)

        Eliminate tax on capital gains (which is basically a tax on inflation)
        Eliminate all refundable and non-refundable credits other than credits for tax actually paid.

        Comment

        • PIGLEE
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2005
          • 446

          #5
          Didn't you know, Congress definition of the word "SIMPLIFICATION" is completely different than the rest of the world. They DO Simplify every year, don't they? And every year they seem to do it better.

          Comment

          • ttbtaxes
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2011
            • 580

            #6
            Originally posted by taxxcpa
            If I had my way, the tax return would be almost simple enough to fit on a post card.

            List and add Salary, interest, dividends, gross rent and business income.
            List and deduct all expenses incurred in earning those incomes
            Deduct Standard deduction, medical expenses, and casualty losses
            Deduct exemption allowance
            Pay 10% tax on the net remaining amount. (maybe an additional 5% for fat cats)

            Eliminate tax on capital gains (which is basically a tax on inflation)
            Eliminate all refundable and non-refundable credits other than credits for tax actually paid.
            On its face "flat tax" sounds easier but the devil is in the details. There would still be enormous tax issues related to what constitute "expenses" and what the "net profit" really is. Accounting methods, depreciation, passive activities, at-risk, elections, and on and on and on.

            I don't see a flat tax any easier except for those who have a W-2 and a few deductions. That's almost none of my clients. For those who have to determine "net income" there would still be volumes of regulations, court cases, rulings and procedures.

            Comment

            • taxxcpa
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2007
              • 978

              #7
              What constitutes expense?

              Originally posted by wiiawiwb
              On its face "flat tax" sounds easier but the devil is in the details. There would still be enormous tax issues related to what constitute "expenses" and what the "net profit" really is. Accounting methods, depreciation, passive activities, at-risk, elections, and on and on and on.

              I don't see a flat tax any easier except for those who have a W-2 and a few deductions. That's almost none of my clients. For those who have to determine "net income" there would still be volumes of regulations, court cases, rulings and procedures.
              Depreciation should be simplified: just three categories: 5-year, 10- year, & 15-year property & straight line method only. Any consistent accounting method should be accepted. Passive activities should be no different from active activities. At-risk might need some rules

              Comment

              • taxmandan
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2005
                • 1037

                #8
                We get myopic in our view since we think the tax code is about collection revenue for the government to spend. The elephant in the room is the social engineering that drives the complexity behind taxation. The pols want to manipulate our lives and this is one means to do so, hence we have EITC, energy credits, etc. etc. And that's why there will be no simplification of revenue redistribution.
                "A man that holds a cat by the tail learns something he can learn no other way." - Mark Twain

                Comment

                • joanmcq
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 1729

                  #9
                  Passive income limitations were created in the 1986 reworking of the tax code to get rid of tax shelters. so would you bring back that loophole?

                  Comment

                  • Bees Knees
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2005
                    • 5456

                    #10
                    Originally posted by joanmcq
                    Passive income limitations were created in the 1986 reworking of the tax code to get rid of tax shelters. so would you bring back that loophole?
                    Not to mention AMT was created in the late 1960's because a couple of millionaires got by with paying no income tax. Would we want to bring back that loophole as well?

                    Comment

                    • Bees Knees
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2005
                      • 5456

                      #11
                      Originally posted by joanmcq
                      Passive income limitations were created in the 1986 reworking of the tax code to get rid of tax shelters. so would you bring back that loophole?
                      At risk limitations were also invented to get rid of tax shelters. Simplify the code and we will have all kinds of ways to let rich investors pay no tax.

                      Comment

                      • NotEasy
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2007
                        • 374

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Jiggers
                        One way to simplify the tax code considerably would be the elimination of the EIC and Child Tax Credit welfare payments as part of filing.

                        Make that a separate department and issue the checks monthly versus all at once.
                        I raise my hand (and my foot) to support your idea. I can never understand why the IRS would lay the responsibility on the tax preparers to determine who gets the social welfare assistance (in the form of EITC). And then the tax preparers will be severely punished because of mistakes made out of it.

                        Comment

                        • taxcraft
                          Member
                          • Sep 2009
                          • 81

                          #13
                          Status Quo

                          I believe that in today's climate, any change, no matter the promises, will make it worse for anyone not supported by lobbyists. Oppose all change.
                          This posting is for general discussion purposes and is not meant to be reliable tax advice.

                          Comment

                          Working...