First time home buyer credit

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hamacher
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2006
    • 180

    #1

    First time home buyer credit

    I have a tax payer that received the first time home buyer credit but is now thinking about using 20% of her home for a home office. Will she need to return 20% of the $8,000 that she received?

    Thanks in advance for the help!
  • solomon
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2006
    • 1012

    #2
    A home office under PL 110-289 is not considered non-qualified use for the §121 exclusion. Therefore, a home office would not negate any part of the FTHB credit.

    If you are interested, the Code is §121(b)(4).
    Last edited by solomon; 12-30-2010, 12:42 PM. Reason: Add Code

    Comment

    • Hamacher
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2006
      • 180

      #3
      Found more info.

      After talking to the client....

      Actually it will be a little more than a home office... I will actually be blending, bottling and if possible selling wine. What are your thoughts regarding this type of activity?

      Comment

      • DaveO
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2005
        • 1453

        #4
        I would say if the house is still their primary residence then they can keep the credit. Can you actually package wine in a residence legally in your state? Here, the farm winery rules allow production on premise but the fermentation and packaging area must be sperate from the home.
        In other words, a democratic government is the only one in which those who vote for a tax can escape the obligation to pay it.
        Alexis de Tocqueville

        Comment

        • Hamacher
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2006
          • 180

          #5
          Any other thoughts?

          Happy New Year.... Any one else have any thoughts?

          Comment

          • solomon
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2006
            • 1012

            #6
            Originally posted by Hamacher
            Happy New Year.... Any one else have any thoughts?
            Relying upon the Code would be adequate. Regarding using part of a residence for business purposes for regular and exclusive use, §280A(c)(1) is quite clear.

            (A) as the principal place of business for any trade or business of the taxpayer,

            (B) as a place of business which is used by patients, clients, or customers in meeting or dealing with the taxpayer in the normal course of his trade or business, or

            (C) in the case of a separate structure which is not attached to the dwelling unit, in connection with the taxpayer’s trade or business.
            As you describe it, the TP could rely upon (A) or (B). The Code does not discriminate against someone in the wine business.

            Finally, non-qualified use is not a factor.
            Last edited by solomon; 01-03-2011, 05:51 PM.

            Comment

            Working...