Say Madoff was your tax client and he wanted you to do 2010 taxes for him. It is clear under current due diligence that we should know or have reason to know about some extra money coming in that needs to be reported.
But what about prior years? If he forgot to tell us about stolen monies then, should we then demand to amend in order to do this year's return? I know it says we just need to tell him of his obligation, but since he lied before should we have reason to know he would probably lie again?
Now a different scenario. What if he only stole a little bit of money in prior years, but the court ordered it to be paid back and he in fact is starting to pay it back. Would it still be necessary to amend (or tell him his obligation to amend) since as a cash basis taxpayer he got extra money in those years?
But what about prior years? If he forgot to tell us about stolen monies then, should we then demand to amend in order to do this year's return? I know it says we just need to tell him of his obligation, but since he lied before should we have reason to know he would probably lie again?
Now a different scenario. What if he only stole a little bit of money in prior years, but the court ordered it to be paid back and he in fact is starting to pay it back. Would it still be necessary to amend (or tell him his obligation to amend) since as a cash basis taxpayer he got extra money in those years?
Comment