I almost posted this to the thread about S Corp wanting to buy gold but I decided it would be more appropriate to start another thread.
Does anyone know if investments that are held through a closely held corporation are available to satisfy personal legal judgments or other personal debt? Seems to me that if it works the protection of one's assets would be a good reason to own assets in a corp.
Second, wouldn't an S Corp get to deduct all the losses sustained during the year against the gains in calculating what gets passed through to the owner and wouldn't capital gains retain their character? Also wouldn't dividends pass through as well? And wouldn't all investment expenses be deductible without the 2% of agi haircut? On the other hand, I suppose the owner would need to pay himself a salary for running the corp unless of course he's relying on a broker or financial adviser to make all the decisions. Of course only a very wealthy investor would gain from this arrangement but there are people with over a million invested.
I don't think owning them in a C Corp makes very much sense. The main problems are the double taxation and what I believe to be the fact that you would lose on your individual return the capital gains character of some of the income while the obligation to pay yourself a salary would remain.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Does anyone know if investments that are held through a closely held corporation are available to satisfy personal legal judgments or other personal debt? Seems to me that if it works the protection of one's assets would be a good reason to own assets in a corp.
Second, wouldn't an S Corp get to deduct all the losses sustained during the year against the gains in calculating what gets passed through to the owner and wouldn't capital gains retain their character? Also wouldn't dividends pass through as well? And wouldn't all investment expenses be deductible without the 2% of agi haircut? On the other hand, I suppose the owner would need to pay himself a salary for running the corp unless of course he's relying on a broker or financial adviser to make all the decisions. Of course only a very wealthy investor would gain from this arrangement but there are people with over a million invested.
I don't think owning them in a C Corp makes very much sense. The main problems are the double taxation and what I believe to be the fact that you would lose on your individual return the capital gains character of some of the income while the obligation to pay yourself a salary would remain.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Comment