A recent district court ruling awarded a Michigan retailer a victory against the IRS. Quality Stores, a chain store, shut down all their stores and terminated their staff, giving them severance pay.
The ruling stated that severance pay was not subject to FICA, for either the employee or the matching employer. The article said they didn't know whether the IRS was going to acquies or continue to slug it out in court or accept the ruling as a precedent.
Anyway, we're told the way to "lock in" client refunds would be to file 941Xs for the periods affected. Here's the rub -- the money process has to be the same as it was collected, in other words, the employer must FIRST PAY BACK the withheld FICA before claiming the refund on the 941X, at which point they may claim the entire FICA tax effect.
This means if our client pays the employees this FICA, they will have to await acquiescence from the IRS (if this ever happens).
Any other knowledge or advice on this?
The ruling stated that severance pay was not subject to FICA, for either the employee or the matching employer. The article said they didn't know whether the IRS was going to acquies or continue to slug it out in court or accept the ruling as a precedent.
Anyway, we're told the way to "lock in" client refunds would be to file 941Xs for the periods affected. Here's the rub -- the money process has to be the same as it was collected, in other words, the employer must FIRST PAY BACK the withheld FICA before claiming the refund on the 941X, at which point they may claim the entire FICA tax effect.
This means if our client pays the employees this FICA, they will have to await acquiescence from the IRS (if this ever happens).
Any other knowledge or advice on this?
Comment