Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

For the Children

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    For the Children

    If your legislature (state, federal, local) wants to pass a truly lousy piece of legislation, one sure-fire way is to call in the press, appoint a spokesman, and twist the subject such that this wonderful new law will be "for the children."

    I think all of us are witnessing state revenue agencies grasping for money by hook or crook. A couple years ago, Tennessee passed a law which requires cashiers at grocery, convenience, or liquor stores to REQUIRE anyone purchasing alcohol products to show their drivers' license. When the law was passed, the sponsors made a big splash on TV telling us that this "visionary new law" would help solve Tennessee's underage drinking problem, and "salvage the lives of so many of our young people." Prior to the law, the cashiers were required to force birth documentation for purchasers whose appearance would indicate "age 30 or younger."

    The state is sending enforcement agents, who are grizzled veterans in their 50s, to stores to see if cashiers are selling them beer without showing license, even if they were obviously over the age limit of 21. Cashiers are inclined to pass over the requirement, especially when long lines form and the buyer is obviously old enough. This is resulting in fines and charges against these cashiers.

    Why? The REAL story is Tennessee wants to control its finances by the withholding of drivers' licenses. They are more interested in the buyer having a drivers' license than they are stopping some 16-yr old kid buying booze. A license is, from the standpoint of law, a privilege and not a right. Don't pay your property taxes, traffic tickets, child support, or any number of other revenue items involving the state, and they jerk your license. They don't care whether you pay your debt to your neighbor or department store, only if you don't pay STATE money.

    I am not supporting deadbeats who don't pay their obligations. But also don't support lawmakers who tag-team with taxing agencies and cook up these schemes under false pretenses.

    I'm sure Tennessee is not the only place with lawmakers devious enough to use this tagline. "For the children" baloney... Coming soon to a taxing authority near YOU.
    Last edited by Nashville; 05-11-2010, 12:24 PM.

    #2
    Hey - This line "for the children" was very popular and worked for the Clintons and will continue to be used by all the politicians until there is enough push back about the misleading statements. Although, I am beginning to wonder if there will ever be any ethics or straight talk happening again. The more a spokesman can fool the people, the prouder every one seems to be of them, and brag about what a good job is being done.

    LT
    Only in government or politics is a "cut in spending" really an increase. It's just not as much of an increase as they wanted it to be, therefore a "cut".

    Comment


      #3
      Look at all the "Children's" hospital expansions of the past two decades (or in some cases they are "Women & Children's" facilities). While some are legitimately dedicated to their stated purpose, the majority of them simply morph into an expansion of the existing facilities. It's hard to deny funding when it's "for the children".

      The moral of the story - it works.
      "The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectful" - John Kenneth Galbraith

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by thomtax View Post
        Hey - This line "for the children" was very popular and worked for the Clintons and will continue to be used by all the politicians until there is enough push back about the misleading statements. Although, I am beginning to wonder if there will ever be any ethics or straight talk happening again. The more a spokesman can fool the people, the prouder every one seems to be of them, and brag about what a good job is being done.

        LT
        The public education cabal has used that line for years to squeeze ever more money out of communities to fund school spending. The recent vote in New Jersey finally was a public rejection of that false claim that more money means better education. The push back has begun.
        "A man that holds a cat by the tail learns something he can learn no other way." - Mark Twain

        Comment


          #5
          Public Education> Gee, isn't that what the state lotteries are for...our children?????? where is that money going...???
          This post is for discussion purposes only and should be verified with other sources before actual use.

          Many times I post additional info on the post, Click on "message board" for updated content.

          Comment


            #6
            The lotteries were promoted as the 'profits' going toward education. The politicians forgot to point out that the current level of general revenue funding would be removed once the lottery was enacted. Then the lottery officials found out about pension funds and 'regular and usual' business expenses. and they have used these perks to reduce the profitability of the lotteries while taxing the winners with icome taxes that no longer go back to education..

            Comment

            Working...
            X