Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jobs bill - Why Feb 3? Why not Jan 1?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Jobs bill - Why Feb 3? Why not Jan 1?

    IR 2010-033
    Two New Tax Benefits Aid Employers Who Hire and Retain Unemployed Workers

    WASHINGTON — Two new tax benefits are now available to employers hiring workers who were previously unemployed or only working part time. These provisions are part of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act enacted into law today.

    Employers who hire unemployed workers this year (after Feb. 3, 2010 and before Jan. 1, 2011) may qualify for a 6.2-percent payroll tax incentive, in effect exempting them from their share of Social Security taxes on wages paid to these workers after the date of enactment. This reduced tax withholding will have no effect on the employee’s future Social Security benefits, and employers would still need to withhold the employee’s 6.2-percent share of Social Security taxes, as well as income taxes. The employer and employee’s shares of Medicare taxes would also still apply to these wages.

    In addition, for each worker retained for at least a year, businesses may claim an additional general business tax credit, up to $1,000 per worker, when they file their 2011 income tax returns.

    “These tax breaks offer a much-needed boost to employers willing to expand their payrolls, and businesses and nonprofits should keep these benefits in mind as they plan for the year ahead,” said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman.

    The two tax benefits are especially helpful to employers who are adding positions to their payrolls. New hires filling existing positions also qualify but only if the workers they are replacing left voluntarily or for cause. Family members and other relatives do not qualify.

    In addition, the new law requires that the employer get a statement from each eligible new hire certifying that he or she was unemployed during the 60 days before beginning work or, alternatively, worked fewer than a total of 40 hours for someone else during the 60-day period. The IRS is currently developing a form employees can use to make the required statement.

    Businesses, agricultural employers, tax-exempt organizations and public colleges and universities all qualify to claim the payroll tax benefit for eligible newly-hired employees. Household employers cannot claim this new tax benefit.

    Employers claim the payroll tax benefit on the federal employment tax return they file, usually quarterly, with the IRS. Eligible employers will be able to claim the new tax incentive on their revised employment tax form for the second quarter of 2010. Revised forms and further details on these two new tax provisions will be posted on IRS.gov during the next few weeks.
    http://www.viagrabelgiquefr.com/

    #2
    No Incentive

    Jesse essentially they "grandfather" the revenue. If this was intended to be an incentive then the response would not be to go back in history and hire someone.

    I've always thought a direct jobs credit would be a good thing (with recapture if they laid people off). Except most of what they've done thus far is to give you credit for hiring targeted groups that make very poor hiring choices in general.

    Comment


      #3
      Jesse - That's no different from the new car sales tax being added to the standard deduction. You had to buy it after 2-16-10. Keep in mind, this is the US Congress and it seems as if very few of them have any idea of what they are voting for and no common sense. They do as their lobbyist tells them.

      LT
      Only in government or politics is a "cut in spending" really an increase. It's just not as much of an increase as they wanted it to be, therefore a "cut".

      Comment


        #4
        The only one's who will benefit are those employers that are already hiring. Good for them, bad for the country.
        This post is for discussion purposes only and should be verified with other sources before actual use.

        Many times I post additional info on the post, Click on "message board" for updated content.

        Comment


          #5
          Thanx for the tip/info, Jesse.

          Originally posted by Jesse View Post
          ...The two tax benefits are especially helpful to employers who are adding positions to their payrolls. New hires filling existing positions also qualify but only if the workers they are replacing left voluntarily or for cause. Family members and other relatives do not qualify...
          I didn't have a clue this thing even existed and it sounds like a good credit for some of my small business people.

          About that "cause," do you know what they define it as? It sort of sounds like somebody fired for misconduct, but I wonder if an employer laying someone simply because business was slow would be "cause"? In that case, if business later picked up and a replacement was hired for that job, then the credit would be allowed (I assume).

          Comment

          Working...
          X