Early in last November, this discussion went on involving several respected board participants. To abbreviate the situation as much as I can, IRS was attempting to assess my client a tax liability for his race car winnings, all parties admitting it was a hobby.
TTB and Section ยง183 gives detailed instructions on how to categorize the applicable expenses, and my strategy was to deduct from the top some expenses which would be "Cost of Goods Sold" thus negating the IRS assessment. Some of you may remember the discussion.
Most of the sentiment opposed the strategy because there were no "goods" to be "sold" in the activity. This position was taken by some of the most knowledgeable members of the board. A couple respected comrades even suggested I was intentionally reporting fraudulently, meaning the position was so clearly wrong that ethical standards were being compromised.
My client and I received a letter today, clearing the assessment due to the acceptable explanation. Maybe I got through to a supervisor who agreed, maybe another supervisor would not have been so agreeable. Is there a lesson? In this case, it is to "trust your own instincts", concepts of right/wrong, and persistent work ethic for your client. If we had lost, the lesson would have been to "listen to those around you" who should know.
I guess we have to live a long time before we learn what to do and when. And even then sometimes we don't always know....
TTB and Section ยง183 gives detailed instructions on how to categorize the applicable expenses, and my strategy was to deduct from the top some expenses which would be "Cost of Goods Sold" thus negating the IRS assessment. Some of you may remember the discussion.
Most of the sentiment opposed the strategy because there were no "goods" to be "sold" in the activity. This position was taken by some of the most knowledgeable members of the board. A couple respected comrades even suggested I was intentionally reporting fraudulently, meaning the position was so clearly wrong that ethical standards were being compromised.
My client and I received a letter today, clearing the assessment due to the acceptable explanation. Maybe I got through to a supervisor who agreed, maybe another supervisor would not have been so agreeable. Is there a lesson? In this case, it is to "trust your own instincts", concepts of right/wrong, and persistent work ethic for your client. If we had lost, the lesson would have been to "listen to those around you" who should know.
I guess we have to live a long time before we learn what to do and when. And even then sometimes we don't always know....
Comment