Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Medical expenses paid by another

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Medical expenses paid by another

    TC Memo. 2009-126

    Expenses paid by father for daughter (in this case as a wedding gift) are not deductible by the daughter.

    #2
    At the risk of sounding dumb, why would they possibly be deductible by the daughter? She didn't pay them.
    Sandy >^..^<

    Comment


      #3
      The reason I posted

      was because this question has come up on the board previously.

      Comment


        #4
        If daughter could have been a dependent with the only exception being gross income test then medical expenses could be deducted by the father.

        He should have gave her the money and let her pay the medical bills.

        Comment


          #5
          It seems a little up in the air to me as to why they decided this way.
          Respondent’s position is that petitioner is
          not entitled to deduct the amount paid because her father paid
          for the services on her behalf. Respondent relies on a series of
          cases holding that taxpayers are not entitled to deduct medical
          expenses which they did not pay or which were reimbursed by some
          other source.
          But if the father had given her the money and then she paid the expense it would have been allowed. I wish they would have explained a little more.
          JG

          Comment


            #6
            Sounds like

            Originally posted by veritas View Post
            (The reason I posted) was because this question has come up on the board previously.
            a good enough excuse to me. Please consider yourself forgiven and absolved of all sin.

            By the way (at the risk of sounding like a smart aleck), are you deducting your black leather jacket, motorcylce helmet, and engineer boots as "protective" clothing?

            P.S. I deducted my adult son's $4 Wal-Mart prescriptions that I paid for him (but don't tell anybody).
            Last edited by Black Bart; 07-01-2009, 09:00 PM.

            Comment


              #7
              Remember

              Just like other regulatory and law enforcement agencies the IRS works within the framework of laws passed by others and has discretion only as specified by others. Correct me if I'm wrong but the Code I believe is clear on these things

              If Dad pays the payment directly she can't deduct the payment but Dad might be able to if the only reason he can't claim her as a dependent is that she made too much money.

              If Dad or anyone else gives her the money and she subsequently makes the payment she can claim the deduction.

              If Dad or anyone else gives her the money in connection with and after the expense she cannot claim the deduction. The only thing is that even after the expense all she and Dad have to do is be careful that there is on official quid pro quo.

              All in all I feel like the hands of the IRS and the Tax Court were tied by a combination of the code and the foolish behavior of Dad and Daughter.

              Comment

              Working...
              X