What is the procedure to dispute a 1099 that was sent to one of our clients? The 1099 was for a sexual harassment settlement and was 1099'd by the attorney's representing this individual. It's reported on a 1099Misc, box 3, other income. The amount is $30,000. The client did call the IRS directly (3 different times to get three answers that were all the same) and gave them the details of the lawsuit. They told her that it was definitely not taxable. The client then received, several months later, the 1099 in the mail.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Received an incorrect 1099.
Collapse
X
-
Let me first say I dont post much on this board..
But according to the info posted and in the Tax Book.. its looks like to me, that it IS taxable. Sec 3-20. "Other Claims"
Damages for nonpysical injuries(deicrimination,defamation,libel,slander,e tc) are all Taxable.
Someone Step in if im wrong.
Chris
-
Originally posted by Burke View PostYou are correct. It is taxable. These laws changed some time back, at least a decade or more. Attorney's fees may be claimed as a deduction, if paid by the taxpayer, as an adjustment on Line 36, Form 1040.
Unlawful discrimination claims legal fees. Attorney fees and
court costs paid after October 22, 2004 for actions involving a claim
of unlawful discrimination, a claim against the U.S. Government,
or a claim made under Section 1862(b)(3)(A) of the Social Security
Act, are deductible as an adjustment to income rather than as
a miscellaneous itemized deduction. The deduction is limited to
the amount included in gross income for that claim.
All other attorney fees and court costs for this type of claim are
deductible as a miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to the
2% AGI limitation.
Comment
-
I don't think
I would (of course, I don't have a law degree, but I wanted one once). Discrimination generally results in some sort of treatment that puts the victim at a disadvantage, such as the loss of a promotion. Though there is gender based discrimination, sexual harrasment is behavior that has a devestating effect on the victim's well being and self esteem, but does not deny them some tanigble item or position based on gender. I'd play it safe and say it's not discrimination. Sorry all, this is totally off the tax subject."Congress has spoken to this issue through its audible silence."
Anyone ever notice they beat the daylights out of the definition of a child, but they don't spend much time at all defining "parent"?
Comment
-
Just a quick Google search turns up the following:
"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individuals against employment discrimination on the basis of sex, as well as race, color .................
Title VII's prohibitions against sex-based discrimination also cover:
Sexual Harassment. This includes practices ranging from direct requests for sexual favors to workplace conditions that create a hostile environment for persons of either gender, including same-sex harassment."
Source: The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment