My client was married from 1999 through 2006. In 2000 she inherited a rental property.
Due to high income all losses from 2000-2006 were suspended. In 2007 she was divorced. The person who did the 2007 return for her omitted the suspended losses. As the rental house was totallly owned by her I think the 7 years of suspended losses should be shown on her 2007 return where she filed as single. Any one disagree?
Due to high income all losses from 2000-2006 were suspended. In 2007 she was divorced. The person who did the 2007 return for her omitted the suspended losses. As the rental house was totallly owned by her I think the 7 years of suspended losses should be shown on her 2007 return where she filed as single. Any one disagree?
Comment