Client inherits house (DOD 5/16/08). There was no executor and no appraisal. Client estimates the value of the house at $120,000. Seeking a quick sale client lists the house for $105,000. Client finally sells the house 11/14/08 for $95,000 at a time some people were practically giving away real estate. Am I bound by the $95,000 for basis or can I argue a higher figure (105,000) because of the distressed market conditions? Thanks.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sale of inherited house
Collapse
X
-
My Two Cents
If you or your client can get a Real Estate Agent to provide you with two or three nearby similar houses that sold around the time of the decedent's date of death I would be comfortable using them as a rough guide. Of course for your purposes it's enough if basis is equal to or more than sale price (which is unlikely to be disputed) because sale of an inherited house at a loss is personal and at no gain would have no tax consequences anyway. The only thing to remember is that in a market where house values are appreciating life would be tougher. The IRS and the courts would not try to argue that there was zero basis but they would accept only the lowest believable basis. It just so happens that in this case that doesn't hurt your client.
-
I can understand
where you're coming from. I like to obtain the highest refunds possible for my clients too. But, I would suggest you do some re-trenching when looking at the original basis of the home. The least I would do is contact a reputable real estate agency and sit down with an agent and come up with a realistic value of the home on DOD. That's the least. I've done several estates with homes and the first (or maybe second or third) thing I tell my client is to obtain an official appraisal of the home. From there you can secure "loss" for the K-1's if it sells for less than market value. But at least you've got a starting point to argue w/IRS in the event that happens.
Good luck.
Larry
Comment
-
Originally posted by Larry M View Postwhere you're coming from. I like to obtain the highest refunds possible for my clients too. But, I would suggest you do some re-trenching when looking at the original basis of the home. The least I would do is contact a reputable real estate agency and sit down with an agent and come up with a realistic value of the home on DOD. That's the least. I've done several estates with homes and the first (or maybe second or third) thing I tell my client is to obtain an official appraisal of the home. From there you can secure "loss" for the K-1's if it sells for less than market value. But at least you've got a starting point to argue w/IRS in the event that happens.
Good luck.
Larry
Erchess, there was no personal use of the property so we have a deductible loss in either case.
Comment
-
Curious
Who sold the house, the heir or the estate? I would not have commented on what an estate can do because I don't know. I was not under the impression that the taxpayer used the property but I was under the impression that the taxpayer took ownership of the house and then sold it. I was definitely of the opinion that when an individual sells an inherited house at a loss without first putting it to use as say a principal residence or a rental property or a business location then the loss is personal. OP seems to have treated the house in the same manner as if it were say a painting or some shares of stock. I thought houses got different treatment. I have to say that I have never actually handled a return for someone who sold real property (inherited or not) at a loss but given the times it seems likely that I will in the future.
Comment
-
Originally posted by erchess View PostWho sold the house, the heir or the estate? I would not have commented on what an estate can do because I don't know. I was not under the impression that the taxpayer used the property but I was under the impression that the taxpayer took ownership of the house and then sold it. I was definitely of the opinion that when an individual sells an inherited house at a loss without first putting it to use as say a principal residence or a rental property or a business location then the loss is personal. OP seems to have treated the house in the same manner as if it were say a painting or some shares of stock. I thought houses got different treatment. I have to say that I have never actually handled a return for someone who sold real property (inherited or not) at a loss but given the times it seems likely that I will in the future.
I have seen the IRS take the position that if there is not an appraisal and the property is sold within 6 months that the sale price is the basis.
Comment
-
The last one I did
was an estate. House had formal appraisel. Sat on the market for several months while the heirs reduced price month by month. It finally sold at (I don't remember exactly) a loss of some $30,000. The loss was divided to the 3 heirs and put on their K1 at $10,000 loss and then transfered to their personal sch D.
Now that is how I did this one just FYI.
Hope everything goes well for you!!
Larry
Comment
-
Thank You Burke
Originally posted by Burke View PostGenerally, if it is not used for business, rental or personal use, but simply sold as soon as feasible after inheritance, it is considered investment property. Cap gain/loss. In most cases, the loss is simply expenses (like real estate commision, if any.)
Comment
Disclaimer
Collapse
This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.
Comment