Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Loss on sale of inherited house

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Loss on sale of inherited house

    Three siblings inherited 1/3 interest in their parents home. One sibling lived in the home for two years after the inheritance, the others did not. The house had a substantial decrease in value since the date of death and has been sold at a loss. Is the loss deductible to the siblings that did not utilize the home as a residence? If so, can anyone cite a tax court case, etc.? If no court case can be found substantiating the deduction, would this be a situation requiring disclosure?
    Last edited by Zee; 02-06-2009, 11:42 AM.

    #2
    I say no loss

    As one sibling was living in the house the house was not being held for investment or rental purposes by the 3 partners, so no loss for anyone.
    Think of a vacation home that you and I own. If I use the place for 15 days and you use it for zero my 15 days count against you.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Kram BergGold View Post
      As one sibling was living in the house the house was not being held for investment or rental purposes by the 3 partners, so no loss for anyone.
      Think of a vacation home that you and I own. If I use the place for 15 days and you use it for zero my 15 days count against you.
      Another CPA (whom I greatly respect) has suggested that since the house was used as a residence by only one sibling, it can be considered capital property by the other siblings and qualify as a capital loss.

      I'm more conservative and would probably not suggest taking a loss, or if one is taken including a disclosure.

      Comment


        #4
        I agree with the "other accountant", loss for non-residents.
        This post is for discussion purposes only and should be verified with other sources before actual use.

        Many times I post additional info on the post, Click on "message board" for updated content.

        Comment


          #5
          A good case could be made for either side of the argument but since I represent my client's best interests I would argue for capital loss treatment for the other two siblings.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by jimmcg View Post
            A good case could be made for either side of the argument but since I represent my client's best interests I would argue for capital loss treatment for the other two siblings.
            Would you attach a disclosure?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Zee View Post
              Would you attach a disclosure?
              Unable to say without taking the time to research the subject.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Zee View Post
                Would you attach a disclosure?

                No, the facts are the facts> two siblings did not live there, did not collect rent, was not a vacation home, so it was investment property. Take the loss.
                This post is for discussion purposes only and should be verified with other sources before actual use.

                Many times I post additional info on the post, Click on "message board" for updated content.

                Comment

                Working...
                X