Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

HRB Second Look

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    HRB Second Look

    HRB's ads claim they found errors on 87% of the returns checked that were prepared by someone else, and an average $1300 tax saving for a "second look".

    How can that be? I never find nearly that percentage of errors.

    #2
    Averages

    Originally posted by Zee View Post
    HRB's ads claim they found errors on 87% of the returns checked that were prepared by someone else, and an average $1300 tax saving for a "second look".

    How can that be? I never find nearly that percentage of errors.
    Well, you know what "average" means as opposed to "median".

    the average depth of a river may be only 4 feet, but where it drops off at 12 feet, that's
    where people who can't swim drown.

    What I'm saying is that I suspect the median error is way less than 1300$!.
    One 4000$ error will skew the results .
    ChEAr$,
    Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Zee View Post
      HRB's ads claim they found errors on 87% of the returns checked that were prepared by someone else, and an average $1300 tax saving for a "second look".

      How can that be? I never find nearly that percentage of errors.
      You don't know what HRB considers an "error" - could just be a spelling mistake of name or address - and who knows what they did to find the $ 1300?

      Talking about ads - last year Jackson-Hewitt had a real lulu that I found quite offensive.
      The ad showed an ambulance driver driving a man to the hospital laying flat in a stretcher, while the EMT attending to the man. Once the driver boasts of JH preparing a 1040 from the last paystub, puts the oxygen mask on himself.
      Uncle Sam, CPA, EA. ARA, NTPI Fellow

      Comment


        #4
        Wouldn't it be nice if there was a requirement to show how the statistics were determined? I guess "truth in advertising" is just an illusion, but people reading these ads don't think a large firm like HRB would "stretch the truth".

        Comment


          #5
          HRB Second Look

          Truth is, I find errors on nearly 99% of prior returns done by HRB. taxea
          Believe nothing you have not personally researched and verified.

          Comment


            #6
            You really do have to be careful with "average", "mean", "median", etc since people use them interchangeably in error. I think that 90% of all statistics are wrong anyhow.
            "The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectful" - John Kenneth Galbraith

            Comment


              #7
              My Understanding

              is that the percentage of returns with errors refers to the percentage of returns where the Block employee finds one or more errors and offers to correct them as opposed to saying that there are none worth correcting. My understanding is that the average refund is the mathematical average of those that have refunds big enough that the clients agree to pay for the amendment. Note that the latter calculation excludes returns amended because the taxpayer needs to pay something now in order to avoid paying more at some point in the future.
              Last edited by erchess; 12-14-2008, 05:53 PM.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by JohnH View Post
                I think that 90% of all statistics are wrong anyhow.
                I agree. It is more like 85%.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Uh....

                  Originally posted by JohnH View Post
                  You really do have to be careful with "average", "mean", "median", etc since people use them interchangeably in error. I think that 90% of all statistics are wrong anyhow.
                  You got any statistics to back that up, John? (grin
                  ChEAr$,
                  Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Statistics true but misleading

                    Originally posted by ChEAr$ View Post
                    You got any statistics to back that up, John? (grin
                    I think that I may have posted this in the past, but will repeat it. During cold war a two way track meet was held between USSR and USA. Story in USSR is:

                    Glorious Soviet track team finishes second while Imperialist American team finishes next to last.

                    LT
                    Only in government or politics is a "cut in spending" really an increase. It's just not as much of an increase as they wanted it to be, therefore a "cut".

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X