And furthermore,
after reading the latest GM article (here's the link):
it seems like he (GM CEO Wagoner) still doesn't "get" it.
While he and his party (he had a driver and security guards -- which is understandable I guess) did drive the 500 miles from Detroit to Washington in three hybrid/high-mileage cars, stopping for lunch along the way like ordinary American tourists; the irony (again) to me is that upon arrival they checked into the upscale J. W. Marriot Hotel where, according to this article, the cheapest room is $399 a night or $800 for a suite. While they don't say which one he stayed in, I'm got an idea. Hell; under the circumstances I'da stayed at Motel 6 -- or Holiday Inn if I was going to "splurge."
Other notes: I saw that the UAW guy offered to "suspend" the Jobs Bank program (the one paying people who don't work 90% of regular wages), which sounds like it might be revived later. Last week he said the union was worried about retirees who weren't old enough for Medicare and a conservative columnist made a good comment on that: "If they want to retire at age 55, it's okay with me but I don't see why the taxpayers should have to carry them until they turn 65."
It should be an interesting day at the hearings.
Originally posted by Black Bart
View Post
it seems like he (GM CEO Wagoner) still doesn't "get" it.
While he and his party (he had a driver and security guards -- which is understandable I guess) did drive the 500 miles from Detroit to Washington in three hybrid/high-mileage cars, stopping for lunch along the way like ordinary American tourists; the irony (again) to me is that upon arrival they checked into the upscale J. W. Marriot Hotel where, according to this article, the cheapest room is $399 a night or $800 for a suite. While they don't say which one he stayed in, I'm got an idea. Hell; under the circumstances I'da stayed at Motel 6 -- or Holiday Inn if I was going to "splurge."
Other notes: I saw that the UAW guy offered to "suspend" the Jobs Bank program (the one paying people who don't work 90% of regular wages), which sounds like it might be revived later. Last week he said the union was worried about retirees who weren't old enough for Medicare and a conservative columnist made a good comment on that: "If they want to retire at age 55, it's okay with me but I don't see why the taxpayers should have to carry them until they turn 65."
It should be an interesting day at the hearings.
Comment