Racing Business

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • S T
    replied
    Don't have a T/p for race cars

    So this post is interesting!

    I don't have a client that is involved in racing NASCAR.

    But curious as to how you would handle. Seems like a LOT of expense, with a very limited amount of $$ income. Aren't there sponsors???

    Sandy

    Leave a comment:


  • jainen
    replied
    shakin their heads

    >>there are many Nascar mechanics shakin their heads at that statement<<

    And a few friends & family noddin their heads.

    >>useful life has nothing to do with the cars ability to make money<<

    Well, we can certainly agree on that point!

    >> but it does have a bearing on whether to depreciate or expense<<

    Useful life is not a consideration in MACRS, which specifies class life. If you are suggesting that race cars are just consumable supplies like a big toner cartridge or something, then we can also agree about the mechanics shakin their heads.

    Leave a comment:


  • veritas
    replied
    I am going to take a stab at it

    The race car is 7 year property falls under entertainment class of property.

    This is aside from the fact the chance of making any money is about the same as becoming an NBA star.

    "I'm going fast again"

    Ricky Bobby

    Leave a comment:


  • RLymanC
    replied
    Race Business

    >>A husband and wife building a race car from scratch couldn't possibly have any realistic expectation of profit within the life of that car.<<

    Well Jainen....there are many Nascar mechanics shakin their heads at that statement.

    Quite a few top fuel drag racers also.

    You statement goes back to my origianl question. The life of a race car, along with engines is very short. It's useful life has nothing to do with the cars ability to make money, but it does have a bearing on wheather to depreciate or expense.

    Leave a comment:


  • veritas
    replied
    Like Ricky Bobby always says

    "Shake and Bake!"

    Leave a comment:


  • jainen
    replied
    something more

    >>Jainen,,,,,,,you have a lot to learn,,,,being brash is not one of them,,,,you have learned that VERY well.<<

    Wasn't my answer helpful? I made my position perfectly clear and gave you the reason why I felt that way. Now, you might very well entertain a different opinion on the tax law, but I hope that is based on something more than personalities.

    Leave a comment:


  • Black Bart
    replied
    Brash...hmmm,

    Isn't that something like being bash...ful? No..no..that wouldn't fit. Well anyway, don't be too hard on the boy -- he's havin' to hold himself in check with me and I just said I'd do it (depreciate) and that doesn't necessarily make me right. Actually, he's right about the odds of making money -- you'd probably stand a better chance of winning the Irish Sweepstakes that clearing cash in that racket.

    Still, here's another tidbit from today's ASPA newsletter:

    Case: James Castagnetta filed a Schedule C with his tax return saying he engaged in the business of wagering. He reported $52K of wagering income from which he deducted losing wages and other business expenses that reduced his net wagering income to $234.

    IRS position: T/p earned his living as a truck driver and his gambling didn't have a profit motive and wasn't a business. Thus, he couldn't file Schedule C and the full $52K increased his AGI and expenses were only deductible as misc. itemized deductions -- 2% limit, blah, blah, blah.

    Court position: He worked 40 hours a week on horse race analysis while driving a truck only part-time, creating detailed computerized data on horses, consulted regularly with racing pros, kept extensive business-like records, and actually had a small profit. All of this indicated that the did have a profit motive, so his gambling qualifies as a business and qualifies for full business deductions.

    James Castagnetta, TC Summary Opinion 2006 24.

    So anyway, jc, whaddaya think? Does the fact that he tries harder have any bearing on the usual client or is this just a fluke TC opinion?
    Last edited by Black Bart; 02-21-2007, 11:16 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • RLymanC
    replied
    Race Business

    Thanks BB...

    Jainen,,,,,,,you have a lot to learn,,,,being brash is not one of them,,,,you have learned that VERY well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Black Bart
    replied
    Race Car

    To RLymanC: Yes; depreciate.

    To jainen: I demand an apology in advance to whichever racer you intend to insult.

    Leave a comment:


  • veritas
    replied
    Here is a formula to use

    for future reference:

    Racing + Business = black hole

    Leave a comment:


  • jainen
    replied
    in the racing business

    >>Building a car for the wife from scratch. Depreciate???<<

    If they were really in the racing business they would already know the answer to this question. But they aren't really in the racing business, because there is no such thing as the racing business. A husband and wife building a race car from scratch couldn't possibly have any realistic expectation of profit within the life of that car.

    Leave a comment:


  • RLymanC
    started a topic Racing Business

    Racing Business

    Husband and wife in racing business.

    Building a car for the wife from scratch. Depreciate???
Working...